>Rooftop solar is dangerous because people are putting stuff on roofs and can fall off in the process, so rooftop solar probably shouldn’t be subsidized IMO. W

>Rooftop solar is dangerous because people are putting stuff on roofs and can fall off in the process, so rooftop solar probably shouldn’t be subsidized IMO. What on earth does the installation risk have to do with whether or not it should be subsidized? Reducing reliance on the grid by decentralizing production of energy, and in an environmentally friendly way at that, is definitely a step in the right direction.