3 ms·
Ew dude, no. Vice knowingly smeared RMS, inexcusably. THey refused to acknowledge this or apologise for their role. They burned McAfee with an iPhone picture w
by mandmandam 4y ago
Ew dude, no.
Vice knowingly smeared RMS, inexcusably. THey refused to acknowledge this or apologise for their role. They burned McAfee with an iPhone picture with location metadata. They're anti-journalism.
I don't know SWU, but people have pointed out that 100% of the profits go to ending poverty. Doesn't sound like something a docxploiter would do.
- SpelingBeeChamp 4y ago> people have pointed out that 100% of the profits go to ending poverty As far as I know, there is no evidence of that beyond the creator's claims. What happened to skepticism? The creator has enormous economic incentives to lie. If he is truly putting all of his channel's revenue "back into the communities that I shoot in" (whatever that means), why wouldn't he be proudly transparent about what that means. How much money? Where has it gone? Can anyone verify it? I would love to be wrong about this, but as far as I know the answers are: Nobody knows. Nobody knows. No.
- mandmandam 4y ago> The creator has enormous economic incentives to lie. Not really. People don't watch his channel to fund communities. > Nobody knows. Nobody knows. No. Have you asked him? > why wouldn't he be proudly transparent about what that means. Why do people need to provide receipts on the internet for their good deeds? It's not like he's using the donated profits line as his main marketing device.