4 ms·
The limits of what we can and can't do are not well-explored, nor well-bounded. For example, there was a fellow (his name escapes me at the moment) who had tra
by carapace 4y ago
The limits of what we can and can't do are not well-explored, nor well-bounded.
For example, there was a fellow (his name escapes me at the moment) who had trained himself to be able to write a sentence with one hand while solving a mathematical equation with the other.
There's a reason why our minds evolved a "unitary" identity or ego, it's evolutionarily advantageous (tautologically, sorry), but it's an illusion. You can "divide" your mind among several tasks (in other words, the brain is not like a CPU, it's more like "the cloud", yeah?) but it's not really as useful as it might seem.
- - - -
(FWIW, my first thought on reading the title was "This person doesn't cook." ;P )
- sudosysgen 4y agoI learnt to do that in elementary school for fun, I would personally do it by doing it concurrently fast enough that the bottleneck was my hand writing instead of the thought, so all I was actually doing in parallel was writing things I had already thought out, so I don't know how much this brings to the concurrency/parallelism conscious thought question.