>Creativity is a big part of what I feel defines me, and if that loses all value then it will surely affect me. Isn't that the whole problem with these tools?

>Creativity is a big part of what I feel defines me, and if that loses all value then it will surely affect me. Isn't that the whole problem with these tools? That they can't capture creativity and context, and therefore only work as augments to competent users rather than replacing users entirely? >What will be a viable career in 20 years? Will the concept of a “career” even make sense by then? I have no idea, and I am uncomfortable with that. Which is why society should answer this ASAP. It's evident that putting the means of production in the hands of a few becomes a problem for the many, once the many are no longer necessary. This has been going on since pre-industrial. The premise has always been "we will make more jobs than we remove". What if that premise is no longer true? What if that premise wasn't true to begin with?