3 ms·
It’s not exploitative to pay people for their time. It’s basic decency. There’s three options for remuneration. 1. Pay nothing 2. Pay them for their time 3.
by zarzavat 4y ago
It’s not exploitative to pay people for their time. It’s basic decency.
There’s three options for remuneration.
1. Pay nothing
2. Pay them for their time
3. Give them a large cut
If the contention is that they may be junkies then 3 is probably not a great idea, better to give the money to charity.
If the contention is that it’s exploitation then surely 2 is less exploitative than 1.
In the end, giving people a voice who don’t have one currently is the complete opposite of exploitation.
- mtlmtlmtlmtl 4y agoIt can be argued that 2 is more exploitative if they would never do it in 1, and are only doing it because they're desperate for their next fix, even though it's not going to improve their life.