2 ms·
intentionally keeping the page up for few more weeks, so that outsiders can justify the move by adobe.
by obilgic 4y ago
intentionally keeping the page up for few more weeks, so that outsiders can justify the move by adobe.
- achow 4y agoFigma was smart. But I use Photoshop and Illustrator… Don’t stop! We believe you should use the best tool for the job. If you’re photo-editing, choose Adobe Photoshop. If you’re doing detailed illustrations, Adobe Illustrator is a no-brainer.
- capableweb 4y ago> Don’t stop! We believe you should use the best tool for the job. If you’re photo-editing, choose Adobe Photoshop. If you’re doing detailed illustrations, Adobe Illustrator is a no-brainer. Meanwhile, the acquisition message from Adobe was something like "We can't wait to make Figma better for photographers and illustrators". Infamous "Everything will grow until it has X" and now it's Figma's turn.
- arkitaip 4y agoShit I've ever thought about until now but I wonder how Adobe will cripple Figma to stop if from competing with their other products. I know tons of designers who do illustrations and simpler en graphics in Figma.
- that_guy_iain 4y agoWhy would anyone need this page to justify Adobe's move? I would think the straight up adoption rate of Figma alone would easily justify it to pretty much anyone.