4 ms·

> Well, it’s been in the works for years So? > It’s made it’s way through the IETF and W3C It's status at W3C is "editor's draft" > and it’s been implemente

> Well, it’s been in the works for years So? > It’s made it’s way through the IETF and W3C It's status at W3C is "editor's draft" > and it’s been implemented in Chrome and Edge since the start of the year. Which makes it a Chrome-only non-standard. > It’s older than covid. Ah. The new definition of standards I see. The only thing that matters is how long it's been in development. Not the checks notes reality and the actual standards track.

josephg 4y ago
> Ah. The new definition of standards I see. The only thing that matters is how long it's been in development. Not the checks notes reality and the actual standards track. There's a process to get features like webtransport into browsers and available everywhere. The process started with some proposals at W3C, continued with some discussions and specs being written up at both the IETF and the W3C. The work more-or-less concludes with broad browser support and applications being written using the spec. The process takes years and its nearly complete. Webtransport has been in the works since at least 2019. Support has landed in Chrome and Edge. Hopefully we'll soon see the spec be ratified, get implementations in Firefox and Safari and then we can start using it in production software. You said: > Because it's not a standard. The status is "Editor's draft" which is barely above "A draft on a coffee-stained napkin" We've come a long way from "a draft on a coffee-stained napkin". A draft on a coffee-stained napkin wouldn't have shipping code in Chrome. Just because you can't use it yet in Firefox doesn't mean there hasn't been a helluva lot of work put into making WebTransport come to life so far, from a whole lot of people who have done a lot more work improving the web than most of us will ever know.

4 ms·

> Well, it’s been in the works for years So? > It’s made it’s way through the IETF and W3C It's status at W3C is "editor's draft" > and it’s been implemente

by dmitriid 4y ago

josephg 4y ago
> Ah. The new definition of standards I see. The only thing that matters is how long it's been in development. Not the checks notes reality and the actual standards track. There's a process to get features like webtransport into browsers and available everywhere. The process started with some proposals at W3C, continued with some discussions and specs being written up at both the IETF and the W3C. The work more-or-less concludes with broad browser support and applications being written using the spec. The process takes years and its nearly complete. Webtransport has been in the works since at least 2019. Support has landed in Chrome and Edge. Hopefully we'll soon see the spec be ratified, get implementations in Firefox and Safari and then we can start using it in production software. You said: > Because it's not a standard. The status is "Editor's draft" which is barely above "A draft on a coffee-stained napkin" We've come a long way from "a draft on a coffee-stained napkin". A draft on a coffee-stained napkin wouldn't have shipping code in Chrome. Just because you can't use it yet in Firefox doesn't mean there hasn't been a helluva lot of work put into making WebTransport come to life so far, from a whole lot of people who have done a lot more work improving the web than most of us will ever know.