3 ms·
I may have misspoke. It's not bad advice to reduce your requests, it's just less critical. In the HTTP/1.1 days, requests were so expensive that you could drop
by kmeisthax 4y ago
I may have misspoke. It's not bad advice to reduce your requests, it's just less critical.
In the HTTP/1.1 days, requests were so expensive that you could drop an order of magnitude in load time by aggregating your resources. Like, to the point where if you had a big JS library that only one page used, you'd aggregate it anyway, because TCP Slow Start is a cruel mistress.
Now, you'd probably want to do some measuring and comparisons first in that situation, because you might be able to get away with saving page weight on pages that don't use the library rather than aggregating it everywhere to save the request.