It basically says muzzling/censoring the speech of others is not itself speech, or at least not protected speech in this context. >the platforms offer a rather

It basically says muzzling/censoring the speech of others is not itself speech, or at least not protected speech in this context. >the platforms offer a rather odd inversion of the First Amendment. That Amendment, of course, protects every person's right to "the freedom of speech." But the platforms argue that buried somewhere in the person's enumerated right to free speech lies a corporation's unenumerated right to muzzle speech.