4 ms·
That is not a right to marry. That case is overturning a 90 year old precedent based on 14A equal protection.
by abigail95 4y ago
That is not a right to marry.
That case is overturning a 90 year old precedent based on 14A equal protection.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- dragonwriter 4y ago> That is not a right to marry. The court’s opinion in the case disagrees, stating “Marriage is one of the 'basic civil rights of man,' fundamental to our very existence and survival.”