This is just another example of laws necessarily needing to create discrete benchmarks for continuous realities. Yes, it probably is true that age 35 is more ma

This is just another example of laws necessarily needing to create discrete benchmarks for continuous realities. Yes, it probably is true that age 35 is more mature and experienced than age 30 and 25. And while arguable, it's at least defensible that the presidency should require a higher bar of maturity and experience than other government offices. But beyond that, the question of where to draw the line is just gonna be clumsy, because the law is a blunt instrument. Feels related to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sorites_paradox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sorites_paradox . Yeah, you can say there's not a big difference between 34 and 35. And you can say there's not a big difference between 33 and 34. And so on.