4 ms·
We are already at a stagnating point in GPU speeds, with the most recent generations from NVIDIA simply being pump more juice (watts) instead of big design chan
by Fabricio20 4y ago
We are already at a stagnating point in GPU speeds, with the most recent generations from NVIDIA simply being pump more juice (watts) instead of big design changes and efficiency optimizations.
I don't believe R&D funds will dry as well, since they will simply be relocated to AI and datacenter workloads which have been on the rise more recently.
- stuntkite 4y agoMaybe kind of in like clock... but the parallel throughput and the ability to securely slice and provision GPU workloads is what was delivered this go around. As well as optical NV-Link and all the crazy new stuff coupled with their CPUs. Go look at crowdsupply and look at the previous gen cores being strapped to massive software defined radio arrays. This isn't just about pushing framerate. It's about vector processing being massively more efficient than CPU for almost everything and the tooling to start floating consumer needs that aren't just making pretty bleep bloops go boom boom for fun times is very, very mature.
- ls612 4y agoThe rumored 4090 is going to pull 450W and score ~19000 on 3DMark time spy extreme. The 3080 pulls 350W and scores 9000 if we are being optimistic. If these numbers are ballpark correct we are talking about 60% more performance per watt in two years. Your story may eventually come true but it is not yet true.
- lossolo 4y agoShouldn't you compare 4080 with 3080? or 3090 with 4090? xx90 costs like 2x xx80.
- bitL 4y ago4090Ti - 95TFlops, 3090Ti - 40TFlops, Titan RTX - 16TFlops. Still a nice increase from generation to generation.