3 ms·
> We need dissent even in the middle of battle. We need to re-asses and continuously examine what we hold true to ensure it is still true. Tacticians act on In
by jstarfish 4y ago
> We need dissent even in the middle of battle. We need to re-asses and continuously examine what we hold true to ensure it is still true.
Tacticians act on Intelligence. Dissent is not Intelligence.
Dissent is so toxic it is literally weaponized to cripple an adversary with indecision and domestic unrest. It is the militarization of gaslighting.
It's not something you want arising mid-campaign, especially when (as in this case) its proponents are entirely fictional.
- dvfjsdhgfv 4y agoI upvoted both of you because you both have valid points in spite of apparent contradiction. Dissent, if it's based on intelligence, can be extremely useful. It's literally something that can save a society. But intelligence involves a careful analysis of facts, and it's something very hard if you deal with an army of trolls.