AI will only be a positive revolution if it's not putting a large number of people out of jobs, but merely increasing their productivity. Or, if it DOES put a

AI will only be a positive revolution if it's not putting a large number of people out of jobs, but merely increasing their productivity. Or, if it DOES put a lot of people out of jobs, it would be good for them to have some ownership over the AI, so that it's the labor force who reaps the benefits, not just the corporations. The bad scenario is mega-corps replace lots of humans with a fleet of machines owned by the mega-corp. The better scenario is we see widespread ownership of AI-powered productive property (that is, distributism), such that mega-corps contract out jobs to humans who own that property, and the property allows those humans to provide better service than before.