3 ms·
I think you're conflating "violating the law" and "violating EEOC doctrine". The law--the civil rights act of 1964--is pretty neutralist. It doesn't make specia
by throwaway894345 4y ago
I think you're conflating "violating the law" and "violating EEOC doctrine". The law--the civil rights act of 1964--is pretty neutralist. It doesn't make special exceptions for marginalized communities the way EEOC doctrine tries to do. It feels very much like this guidance aspires to violate the spirit of the law while not running afoul of the most generous interpretation.
- pseudalopex 4y agoThe Supreme Court said accidental discrimination can be illegal.[1] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disparate_impact https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disparate_impact
- PubliusMI 4y agoDo you think the Supreme Court would say the same if they had a case today...?