7 ms·

I can think of two reasons: 1. It hinders competition. You can't really provide a marketplace thay competes with Amazon by having lower prices (for example by

by thayne 4y ago

I can think of two reasons: 1. It hinders competition. You can't really provide a marketplace thay competes with Amazon by having lower prices (for example by taking a smaller cut from sellers), because sellers aren't allowed to list lower prices on your marketplace. Or alternatively, you can't compete by selling directly from you website, because you can't offer a lower price than on Amazon. 2. It means even if you buy directly from the seller, you have to pay a higher price because it is listed on Amazon. In effect people who bu directly are subsidizing a lower price for people who buy on Amazon. This applies to the credit card case as well.

LatteLazy 4y ago
Surely it encourages competition: Since the cost cannot just be passed onto consumers, the company making the decision over where to list has an incentive to actually consider other options? Also, the only reason we want competition is because it should get lower prices for consumers. Competition isn't a good in and of itself, it's just a means to an end. So if more competition means higher prices for the same goods, then who needs it? I don't quite get your second point: if the consumer is paying the same price, why do they care whether 100% goes to the supplier, or 99% or 0.01? If an item costs me 10USD, I don't care who get's that money, I just care that I don't get to keep it right
- toastercat 4y ago
  > Also, the only reason we want competition is because it should get lower prices for consumers. That is not the only reason free market capitalists want competition. Competition should also promote a variety of choice, innovation, and dynamism in other services to consumers, not just low product prices.
- stetrain 4y ago
  This rule doesn’t just mean they can’t raise prices on Amazon, it means they can’t lower prices elsewhere. If another marketplace takes a lower cut, allowing the seller to set a lower price while keeping margins, they can’t do so under this arrangement without taking a hit on Amazon sales. The market should be encouraging finding the lowest-margin distribution path, not artificially propping up prices elsewhere to match Amazon’s margins.
- thayne 4y ago
  > why do they care whether 100% goes to the supplier, or 99% or 0.01? If an item costs me 10USD, I don't care who get's that money, I just care that I don't get to keep it right But you care if it costs you $10 instead of $9. My point is that Amazon's rules means the price is higher for everyone, in order to cover Amazon's fees. Without them, if you are willing to buy from somewhere less convenient than amazon, you can get a better price.
cortesoft 4y ago
On the other hand, as a shopper, I like knowing that the price I see on Amazon is the lowest price I can find the item. I don’t want to have to check the price of every item on the manufacturers site to see if I can get it cheaper there. Just imagine I want to by a widget, and there are many manufacturers. I can search on Amazon, and get all of the prices for all the manufacturers right in one place, and I know that each price I see is the cheapest. I don’t have to search for 10 different manufacturer websites and check each price. I can just sort by it, and then one click buy. I understand the anticompetitive concerns, but there is also a big advantage for consumers to be able to have a single market that has the lowest prices available and easy ordering.
- Symbiote 4y ago
  Sites like Pricerunner compare prices from many online shops.
- onepointsixC 4y ago
  You prefer Amazon to dictate the floor price of something for the purpose of convenience? If you prefer to use Amazon, fine, but your choice shouldn't get to dictate to everyone else that there's no better deal else where. Amazon isn't getting you a better deal here, it's making sure there's no better deal else where.
- tchalla 4y ago
  Yes there are many times big advantages to the individuals which aren’t allowed by law nor should it be.
- mentalpiracy 4y ago
  I agree that it would be great as a consumer, but Amazon isn’t offering anyone an honest list of those widget prices. If I am a widget manufacturer, selling on Amazon means I am no longer competing for your purchase with just my market peers. On some level, I am now competing against all listings in that category, including grey market resellers because Amazon doesn’t police for shit.
- idontpost 4y ago

by thayne 4y ago

LatteLazy 4y ago

Surely it encourages competition: Since the cost cannot just be passed onto consumers, the company making the decision over where to list has an incentive to actually consider other options? Also, the only reason we want competition is because it should get lower prices for consumers. Competition isn't a good in and of itself, it's just a means to an end. So if more competition means higher prices for the same goods, then who needs it? I don't quite get your second point: if the consumer is paying the same price, why do they care whether 100% goes to the supplier, or 99% or 0.01? If an item costs me 10USD, I don't care who get's that money, I just care that I don't get to keep it right

toastercat 4y ago
> Also, the only reason we want competition is because it should get lower prices for consumers. That is not the only reason free market capitalists want competition. Competition should also promote a variety of choice, innovation, and dynamism in other services to consumers, not just low product prices.
stetrain 4y ago
This rule doesn’t just mean they can’t raise prices on Amazon, it means they can’t lower prices elsewhere. If another marketplace takes a lower cut, allowing the seller to set a lower price while keeping margins, they can’t do so under this arrangement without taking a hit on Amazon sales. The market should be encouraging finding the lowest-margin distribution path, not artificially propping up prices elsewhere to match Amazon’s margins.
thayne 4y ago
> why do they care whether 100% goes to the supplier, or 99% or 0.01? If an item costs me 10USD, I don't care who get's that money, I just care that I don't get to keep it right But you care if it costs you $10 instead of $9. My point is that Amazon's rules means the price is higher for everyone, in order to cover Amazon's fees. Without them, if you are willing to buy from somewhere less convenient than amazon, you can get a better price.

cortesoft 4y ago

On the other hand, as a shopper, I like knowing that the price I see on Amazon is the lowest price I can find the item. I don’t want to have to check the price of every item on the manufacturers site to see if I can get it cheaper there. Just imagine I want to by a widget, and there are many manufacturers. I can search on Amazon, and get all of the prices for all the manufacturers right in one place, and I know that each price I see is the cheapest. I don’t have to search for 10 different manufacturer websites and check each price. I can just sort by it, and then one click buy. I understand the anticompetitive concerns, but there is also a big advantage for consumers to be able to have a single market that has the lowest prices available and easy ordering.

Symbiote 4y ago
Sites like Pricerunner compare prices from many online shops.
onepointsixC 4y ago
You prefer Amazon to dictate the floor price of something for the purpose of convenience? If you prefer to use Amazon, fine, but your choice shouldn't get to dictate to everyone else that there's no better deal else where. Amazon isn't getting you a better deal here, it's making sure there's no better deal else where.
tchalla 4y ago
Yes there are many times big advantages to the individuals which aren’t allowed by law nor should it be.
mentalpiracy 4y ago
I agree that it would be great as a consumer, but Amazon isn’t offering anyone an honest list of those widget prices. If I am a widget manufacturer, selling on Amazon means I am no longer competing for your purchase with just my market peers. On some level, I am now competing against all listings in that category, including grey market resellers because Amazon doesn’t police for shit.
idontpost 4y ago