You can defend it all you want with "historical precedent," it's still quite dystopian whether or not conditioning for 70 years has any impact. My point is that

You can defend it all you want with "historical precedent," it's still quite dystopian whether or not conditioning for 70 years has any impact. My point is that any law against free speech probably has more sinister intentions than are presented. "Do you have any proof?" Read 1984 and try to understand how close laws against holocaust denial are to thought crimes. You really don't understand what part of the timeline we're in. Time is running out.