> to miss the point of the section 230 debate. All of the stuff here is about what the law is now This is something that kind of irritates me about Mike Masnic

> to miss the point of the section 230 debate. All of the stuff here is about what the law is now This is something that kind of irritates me about Mike Masnick (who I generally enjoy reading). He always seems so focused on the current state of the law that he seems blind to the debate.