3 ms·
It could well be that they are paid very little, the majority of reports are true positives, have a quota to make, and expect no consequence for false positives
by michaelmrose 4y ago
It could well be that they are paid very little, the majority of reports are true positives, have a quota to make, and expect no consequence for false positives. If its outsourced they may have a bad grasp of the language as well.
- z9znz 4y ago> no consequence for false positives This could be the key point. Penalties for letting something bad slip past, but no penalties for falsely flagging. It’s a pragmatic solution, but it is almost by definition inhuman.