> Individual rights do not trump collective rights in all cases. I agree, though: a) I didn't make that claim b) You may as well just say "one right does not

> Individual rights do not trump collective rights in all cases. I agree, though: a) I didn't make that claim b) You may as well just say "one right does not always trump another", which is just as true and more insightful Which makes this part: > This lack of nuance in your argument is absurd. actually absurd. And this part: > The selfish part is suggesting that your individual rights trump everyone else’s rights. as I've already pointed out, is not something I claimed. This was my claim: “To protect or support one individual's rights is to protect or support everyone's individual rights." Perhaps you'd like to try again, and this time actually address me with some respect, not least by actually replying to what was written and not what is most convenient to you in the fantasy argument you've spilled out from your head.