I’m curious if they can do this/how politically feasible it is. In Canada, banks have this for things like e-transfers and preventing suspicious transactions.

I’m curious if they can do this/how politically feasible it is. In Canada, banks have this for things like e-transfers and preventing suspicious transactions. However, when people acknowledge the warnings and still go ahead anyway, they cry bloody murder and the bank ends up refunding people for fraudulent activity the people explicitly authorized after being warned.