> Bitcoin uses less energy than YouTube I believe this is totally wrong - I think Bitcoin uses significantly more than YouTube. Where did you get your numbers

> Bitcoin uses less energy than YouTube I believe this is totally wrong - I think Bitcoin uses significantly more than YouTube. Where did you get your numbers? The 2020 Google Environmental Report [1] lists the total energy consumption of all Google/Alphabet data centers as ~12.2 TWh/year in 2019 and growing at about 2 TWh/year. (See page 32.) So in 2022 the approximate usage for all Google/Alphabet properties, not just YouTube, would be about 18.2 TWh. Meanwhile, Statista estimates Bitcoin as consuming about 177 TWh/year [2]. So this means Bitcoin consumes about 10x as much as not just YouTube but all Google/Alphabet data centers combined! There are some urban legends about YouTube using much more energy than it does; some of those urban legends are refuted here: [3] [1] https://www.gstatic.com/gumdrop/sustainability/google-2020-environmental-report.pdf https://www.gstatic.com/gumdrop/sustainability/google-2020-e... [2] https://www.statista.com/statistics/881472/worldwide-bitcoin-energy-consumption/ https://www.statista.com/statistics/881472/worldwide-bitcoin... [3] https://www.iea.org/commentaries/the-carbon-footprint-of-streaming-video-fact-checking-the-headlines https://www.iea.org/commentaries/the-carbon-footprint-of-str...