4 ms·
I would hope removing food that is causing violent crime, is a net positive enough that the little people would prefer it. Of course there is no incentive to h
by barrysteve 4y ago
I would hope removing food that is causing violent crime, is a net positive enough that the little people would prefer it.
Of course there is no incentive to hurt the poor, the debate is over what is the correct way of helping them.
Saving a few bucks on a big mac meal, in exchange for their health and crime, may not be the best way forward.
From a non-us perspective it's a bit odd that a CEO has to point out that violent crime is happening too much, that it's bad and that something should be done about it. That's the gov's job?
- odessacubbage 4y agowhen you are very poor, meals are uncertain and every dollar counts, saving a few bucks on a big mac is actually a pretty big deal. not to mention mcdonalds are open much later than homeless shelters or soup kitchens, safer too. being able to get warm and be fed for low cost is something easy to take for granted but when you have nothing it really means a lot.