4 ms·
>would then require extra complexity to provide a syntax for lines that should not get wrapped, And what's stopping someone implementing this?
by atomicdog 15y ago
>would then require extra complexity to provide a syntax for lines that should not get wrapped,
And what's stopping someone implementing this?
- JoshTriplett 15y ago> And what's stopping someone implementing this? Most likely, not wanting to inflict such a syntax on git users, when the current approach works just fine. But nothing stops someone from writing a patch with an off-by-default option for such a syntax, and proposing it for inclusion.