4 ms·

You don't typically don't want to switch output resolution to match the resolution of whatever your outputting on modern displays, but instead want to match the

You don't typically don't want to switch output resolution to match the resolution of whatever your outputting on modern displays, but instead want to match the panel resolution and software scale the content. You're way too likely to confuse the monitor trying to match resolution. There's something to be said for matching frame rate, but there's even more dragons in that practically.

gregmac 4y ago
Doesn't that depend on how good the implementation is? Some modern TVs and receivers have exceptionally good scaling built-in. I'd also bet with certain types of displays (eg: OLED, HDR and/or local dimming) there's benefits when there's a different aspect ratio (eg 21:9), letting the TV do something different to the backlight when it knows there there is no content in parts of the display vs getting a black signal.
booi 4y ago
Actually matching framerates is a lot more common, for example to provide smooth playback of 23.976/24 or 25 fps when the native refresh is 60hz (not cleanly divisible). Usually this is done by going up to 72hz or 75hz rather than down but it's a lot better than keeping at 60hz and stuttering. Previously this was accomplished with something called telecining which.. isn't great.,
- account42 4y ago
  Shouldn't the optimal solution be to adjust the display refresh rate using vesa adpative sync these days? No need for shitty interpolation when most panels can run at variable refresh rates.
  - water8 4y ago
    You can have multiple displays connected to an HDMI hub with different refresh rates. I have this problem with a projector that runs at 240 Hz in a TV that runs at 60 Hz. It confuses my receiver.
  - booi 4y ago
    adaptive sync isn't well supported yet
Retr0id 4y ago
Truly modern TVs have much better scaling and frame interpolation than whatever your OS or media player can do.
- ChuckNorris89 4y ago
  Most people hang on to their TV for 10 years or way more than that. Expecting people to have truly modern TVs is a crapshoot. Only enthusiasts upgrade to the latest and greatest.
  - ChuckNorris89 4y ago
    And unless you're a very informed technical savvy consumer who does his research and knows what he's buying, upgrading your TV might end up being a downgrade for you as you could end up replacing a perfectly good dumb TV with a new WiFi "smart" TV that spies on you and serves you ads. No thanks, modern TVs!
- LtWorf 4y ago
  At the cost of seeing the lips move a little after the actor said the words :D
- water8 4y ago
  What makes the TV software better than OS software?
  - capableweb 4y ago
    Usually software designed explicitly for the hardware where it runs, while OS software is designed to run on general hardware. If there is hardware specific fixes, they might be skipped as it'll make compatibility worse while software designed for exact hardware doesn't make tradeoffs like that at all.
    - water8 4y ago
      I don’t think the actual hardware components inside a TV are all that different from an SOC because they’re essentially doing the same thing.

gregmac 4y ago

Doesn't that depend on how good the implementation is? Some modern TVs and receivers have exceptionally good scaling built-in. I'd also bet with certain types of displays (eg: OLED, HDR and/or local dimming) there's benefits when there's a different aspect ratio (eg 21:9), letting the TV do something different to the backlight when it knows there there is no content in parts of the display vs getting a black signal.

booi 4y ago

Actually matching framerates is a lot more common, for example to provide smooth playback of 23.976/24 or 25 fps when the native refresh is 60hz (not cleanly divisible). Usually this is done by going up to 72hz or 75hz rather than down but it's a lot better than keeping at 60hz and stuttering. Previously this was accomplished with something called telecining which.. isn't great.,

account42 4y ago
Shouldn't the optimal solution be to adjust the display refresh rate using vesa adpative sync these days? No need for shitty interpolation when most panels can run at variable refresh rates.
- water8 4y ago
  You can have multiple displays connected to an HDMI hub with different refresh rates. I have this problem with a projector that runs at 240 Hz in a TV that runs at 60 Hz. It confuses my receiver.
- booi 4y ago
  adaptive sync isn't well supported yet

Retr0id 4y ago

Truly modern TVs have much better scaling and frame interpolation than whatever your OS or media player can do.

ChuckNorris89 4y ago
Most people hang on to their TV for 10 years or way more than that. Expecting people to have truly modern TVs is a crapshoot. Only enthusiasts upgrade to the latest and greatest.
- ChuckNorris89 4y ago
  And unless you're a very informed technical savvy consumer who does his research and knows what he's buying, upgrading your TV might end up being a downgrade for you as you could end up replacing a perfectly good dumb TV with a new WiFi "smart" TV that spies on you and serves you ads. No thanks, modern TVs!
LtWorf 4y ago
At the cost of seeing the lips move a little after the actor said the words :D
water8 4y ago
What makes the TV software better than OS software?
- capableweb 4y ago
  Usually software designed explicitly for the hardware where it runs, while OS software is designed to run on general hardware. If there is hardware specific fixes, they might be skipped as it'll make compatibility worse while software designed for exact hardware doesn't make tradeoffs like that at all.
  - water8 4y ago
    I don’t think the actual hardware components inside a TV are all that different from an SOC because they’re essentially doing the same thing.