3 ms·
> decolonization has to cost it something to mean something Didn't they, you know, give up their empire? And invite their former colonies to colonize them, to
by tarakat 4y ago
> decolonization has to cost it something to mean something
Didn't they, you know, give up their empire? And invite their former colonies to colonize them, to the point that they are now a minority in their own capital?
If anything this should have taught them that, not only will it never be enough, but every act of atonement will count for nothing and be immediately forgotten and discredited.
- ekam 4y agoThe idea that the British left their colonies because they just gave them up is hilariously naive
- tarakat 4y agoAnything bad they did they did with full malicious desire and intent, and anything good they did is either ignored or, as I said, discredited ("they only did it because they were forced!") If they give up the Koh-I-Noor to whomever plundered it before them, ten years later someone like you will be claiming that it is hilariously naive to believe they just gave it up.