3 ms·
The platform should ban the user, with an explanation written by a human being explaining what rule they broke. And no, "our shiny new machine learning algorith
by TakeBlaster16 4y ago
The platform should ban the user, with an explanation written by a human being explaining what rule they broke. And no, "our shiny new machine learning algorithm flagged your account" doesn't cut it. Arbitration should be an option. I could write a lot more, but hopefully you get the idea.
- vel0city 4y agoBan the user? But how would that person ever find a match with a dating site banning them? It's completely socially ostracizing for that user to not be able to use the app. How would they ever be able to function in society without access to the Catholic dating app?
- TakeBlaster16 4y agoDon't forget that we're comparing: 1. someone who broke site rules 2. someone who did not break site rules I advocate group #1 suffering the consequences for their actions. I do not advocate group #2 losing access due to factors outside their control. Not sure why you're getting the two confused.
- vel0city 4y agoThe person in this original post broke Discord's posted rules. So this whole debate entirely falls under the category of #1. That's why I'm confused here. So I'm glad to see we agree. When you break the rules, it's OK for the site to ban you. So in this instance, Discord did nothing wrong, they banned someone who broke the site's rules.