4 ms·
That makes more sense if the gradient is radial. For a linear gradient, inversion gives the appearance of a changing light source - just like the example given
by chrisdroukas 15y ago
That makes more sense if the gradient is radial. For a linear gradient, inversion gives the appearance of a changing light source - just like the example given shows.
A radial gradient, on the other hand, might more typically assume an 'oveerhead' light, which is why inversion makes sense.
- Yaggo 15y agoFor me the linear gradient hints that the surface is curved on one axis, i.e. is cylindrical, not spherical. Of course the context plays a role too on the perceived illusion; the appearance of changing light source may be stronger for lonely button (vs. group of elements sharing the same light source).