I'd go for that. As far as I'm concerned, Smith-IRV is better than IRV in every circumstance. The only counterpoint I've seen are twisty arguments about a modif

I'd go for that. As far as I'm concerned, Smith-IRV is better than IRV in every circumstance. The only counterpoint I've seen are twisty arguments about a modified "Majority Criterion", where a single-member Smith Set might not (arguably) be someone that a majority "voted for". Which would seem to apply just as much to IRV as well, but IRV adherents that make this point seem to think that the mechanics of IRV somehow overcome that.