> You really need to define "significant" How about Any number that is greater than the pre-pandemic average for persons that age before the vaccines Also, if

> You really need to define "significant" How about Any number that is greater than the pre-pandemic average for persons that age before the vaccines Also, if your standard is going to be “temporary” and “easily treatable” as core components of “insignificant risk” for the vaccines…that would also apply to COVID itself in most people under the age of 50. But…I think your equation could have some value if the vaccines were effective at preventing covid infection. However, since they don’t, and they don’t appear to diminish hospitalization risk of covid for younger people (like older people), but the vaccines do have a statistical increase on more pericarditis and myocarditis, logic would dictate that there is a possible slight negative risk by younger folk getting the vaccine. Especially for males.