>Thus, we're left going "hey, what happened with every other vaccination we've ever done?" and making decisions based on that wealth of information. Now you're

>Thus, we're left going "hey, what happened with every other vaccination we've ever done?" and making decisions based on that wealth of information. Now you're being disingenuous. There is another approach, and it is the one traditionally endorsed by the medical profession: prudence. Put plainly: the deontologically correct way of proceeding would have been to say "we don't know enough to assert the vaccines are safe", and not thrust them onto an unwilling public. >Do we have a 20 year safety study on going unvaccinated in this pandemic? No. This is why I am not arguing against vaccines. I am arguing against mandates.