3 ms·
Exactly, as much as we love open source in many ways it's also kind-of destroyed the mid-segment of fixed-software sales(the dBase, Lightwaves, Turbo Pascals,et
by whizzter 4y ago
Exactly, as much as we love open source in many ways it's also kind-of destroyed the mid-segment of fixed-software sales(the dBase, Lightwaves, Turbo Pascals,etc) and we really need a way to find back to it.
Because not only is people not gaining income from their work (even if for example the Blender foundation exists.. how many people can live off it?) but we're also straining a lot of open source developers with support that really needs to be paid-for in some fashion.
I don't fault Stallman in this instance(not a fan in general), the GPL always allowed re-sales and I think he did see something akin to the shareware world even with free software, but what happened was the combination with the Internets ubiquity made everyone just jump to the source (kind of rightfully due to bad shenanigans by middlemen actors like SourceForge or worse) leaving potential supporting middlemen screwed.
- mjevans 4y agoStallman would probably be happy with the idea of paying an expert who used open tools. It's no different from taking a bus, or hiring a taxi if you don't know how to drive. My impression is that the key aspect revolves around freedom to participate in society. In theory anyone can run their own email, irc, matrix, etc servers. Anyone is free to use an off the shelf open source product, a paid product, or even write their own if there is need.