No, he is just very often egregiously wrong, but in ways that we have become desensitized enough to find often hard to tease out. Usually the Howler may be tra

No, he is just very often egregiously wrong, but in ways that we have become desensitized enough to find often hard to tease out. Usually the Howler may be traced via his inclination to treat whatever he did while at Microsoft as inherently above reproach, and not, as it often was, totally bonkers. But thinking it over, his apologetics for Lotus is the Howler, here. If Lotus really had engaged in the reasoning he suggests, they could trivially have chosen 1901 for their epoch with no compromise to accuracy.