4 ms·

So, your reasoning is that censorship (or "changes to say different things just to a certain public") is not really it if it gets done in many but not all the i

So, your reasoning is that censorship (or "changes to say different things just to a certain public") is not really it if it gets done in many but not all the issues? So, say, if in a country some search terms are blocked you can not talk about censorship because not ALL the searches are blocked. Sorry, I disagree. Even if they change only the cover of a single issues, and they do it to block some ideas to be said in the USA, well that is censorship and is unacceptable.

nodata 15y ago
It's not censorship. The covers are different. A different market being interested in different things does not equal censorship. What is not shown is the times when the European covers are different to the other editions. What is not shown is if there are only two editions of Time - one for US, one for elsewhere. We need to see all covers to make a judgement about what is happening.