> If malicious means transferring funds that don't exists, it'll be noticed. who cares? As far as I can tell, a majority that wants to block a vote can do so

> If malicious means transferring funds that don't exists, it'll be noticed. who cares? As far as I can tell, a majority that wants to block a vote can do so freely and the only resolution is a fork where people just assume that the honest fork will win out. I also think it's not a majority but actually just a little more than a third to block a vote for eth