9 ms·
That's what peeked my interest in crypto in the first place, and is also the reason I am no longer on that bandwagon. Because you don't really own it in web3
by unionpivo 4y ago
That's what peeked my interest in crypto in the first place, and is also the reason I am no longer on that bandwagon.
Because you don't really own it in web3 either. Until normal people get comfortable with self hosting their own stuff there will always be gate keepers and places where governments can apply pressure.
You don't really own your crypto coins unless you have your own wallet on your own hardware (with proper backups as well). And for most normal people even just that is too much.
And we are rapidly approaching a point where we don't really even own our hardware any more.
And everything else, that is build on top of that needs to run on top of some machine somewhere and unless you own it, you can't really rely on it. It's all encrypted so they can't steel from you (unless bugs), but they can also shut it down. Sure there are plenty(and jet still not enough) of nodes on ipfs system now. But many someone's need to run them and it's always possible that people will loose interest or economies will change and number of nodes goes down enough that it becomes practically unusable.
Same problem is with much of the other web3 stack. With few companies controlling much of the developers/stack and infrastructure needed.
Sure it's all open source and distributed, but even nowadays in early stages, before the masses come in, we are talking about lot of infrastructure needed to run everything.
And right now there are VC's putting billions in investments in this space, so having lots of infrastructure for "free" seems like it works. But sooner or later this people will want their money back, with interest, and regular people will be even more screwed, because this is completely unregulated (which is why VC's love it so much ) as a design principle.
On the other hand if you are technical enough to be able to self host your own stuff, boring old federated systems, like smtp, jabber , matrix, ... are a lot easier, cheaper, with a lot less moving part - easier to administer etc.
I am all for federated content and people owning their own digital features in their own hands and I think crypto chains are a distraction/overcomplication at best and could possibly be a trap for ultimate corporate walled gardens.
So my focus is on boring old self hosted federated services.
- swalsh 4y ago"You don't really own your crypto coins unless you have your own wallet on your own hardware" Well, that's the thing about freedom. It's a pretty big responsibility. You can't offload the responsibility and still be free. True in the real world, and true in crypto.
- Cederfjard 4y agoThat seems like a huge obstacle to your vision reaching critical mass. The last thing your everyday person wants is more responsibility.
- swalsh 4y agoFrankly, I'm not interested in "critical mass" whatever that means. I want the benefits of free (as in speech not beer) digital products and services. I don't need a critical mass of the population to do that. Bitcoiners talk about critical mass adoption because they want to replace the existing system. I view crypto as in addition to it, not instead of it.
- Cederfjard 4y agoWell, if there isn't much adoption, there likely won't be many products and services for you to use. You may be fine with that, but it's not necessarily congruent with the enormous amount of hype this whole experiment has received in the last decade or so.
- pid-1 4y agoDo you own a internet provider? DNS servers? Chip manufacturer? Do you grow your own crops? You always need to rely on third parties for finance (even if you manage your own crypto wallet) and for other stuff in life.