4 ms·
Headline slightly misleading. It will be interpreted as "vaccine too dangerous for under 50". Here Denmark will keep vaccinating young relatives of people at r
by phtrivier 4y ago
Headline slightly misleading. It will be interpreted as "vaccine too dangerous for under 50".
Here Denmark will keep vaccinating young relatives of people at risk. Which may make sense, or not. Who knows ? Even all doctors are not 100% confident about anything anymore.
At least it goes slighly against the narrative of "everyone's government is deep in the pocket of big pharma", and more into the narrative of "everyone is trying whatever"
- colonwqbang 4y agoI suppose it should say "no longer offering free vaccinations".
- phtrivier 4y agoNot even sure, I suppose young relatives of heavily at risk people will not have to pay for next jabs (assuming the other jabs also came at no cost, which I assume is true given Denmark's réputation, but I might be wrong.) My understanding (again, I might be mistaken) is they the correct headline should be "Denmark to focus booster campaign on at-risk people". (Which is much less clikbaity, I guess ;) ?)