4 ms·
Totally, but I specifically meant the RJ45 connector itself! WRT other technologies, we've updated USB and Thunderbolt to use the compact USB-C connector stand
by firecall 4y ago
Totally, but I specifically meant the RJ45 connector itself!
WRT other technologies, we've updated USB and Thunderbolt to use the compact USB-C connector standard. We've updated display connectors many times over the years!
And yes, there are legacy installations and so on, but that's never a good reason to not advance a technology!
We'd all still on SCSI connectors or SATA if legacy was a good reason not to evolve technology!
Just looking at a rack of patch panels and switches, you can see a lot of space is taken up with supporting the RJ45 connector itself!
None of the other comments really explain why we still use RJ45. Because it's a standard and legacy isnt a reason to not have developed a modern compact alternative!
- Akronymus 4y agoOh, you meant the connector itself. I guess because it is good enough? SCSI couldn't scale to higher throughputs afaict, while the RJ45 mostly doesn't impact speeds at all.