Wow! Love it, this is the most exciting thing I've seen in a while. I'm working on something similar, and it's so great to see others who seem to get-it and are

Wow! Love it, this is the most exciting thing I've seen in a while. I'm working on something similar, and it's so great to see others who seem to get-it and are chasing generalization in AI systems! A few questions: 1. I'm curious if you're representing the task-operations using RL techniques (as many personal assistant systems seem to be) or if this is entirely a seq2seq transformer style model for predicting actions? 2. Assumption: Due to scaling of transformers, I assume that this is not directly working on the image data of a screen, and instead is working off of DOM trees; (2a) is this the case? and (2b) if so, are you using purely linear tokenization of the tree or are you using something closer to Evoformer (AlphaFold style) to combine graphs-neural nets and transformers? 3. Have you noticed that learning actions and representations of one application transfers well to new applications? or is the quality of the model heavily dependent on app domain? I noticed multiple references to data applications (Excel, tableau, etc.). My challenge is that large language models and AI systems in general are about to hit a wall in the data domain because they fundamentally don't understand data [1] [2], which will ultimately limit the quality of these capabilities. I am personally tackling this problem directly. I'm tying to prove more coherent data-aware operations in these systems by building a "foundation model" for tabular data that connects to LLMs (think RETRO style lookups of embeddings (representing columns of data)). I have been prototyping conversational AI systems (mostly Q/A oriented), and have recently been moving towards task oriented operations (right now, transparently, just SQL executors). There seem to be good representations of DOM tree/visual-object models that you all are working with to take reasonable action, however I assume these are limited in scale (N^2 and all), and so I am wondering if you have any opinions on how to extend these systems for data (especially as the "windowed context grows" (eg. an excel with 100k+ rows))? [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.03253 https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.03253 "Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Need" [2] https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.01889 https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.01889 "In summary, we think that a fundamental reorientation of the domain may be necessary. For now, the question of whether the use of current deep learning techniques is beneficial for tabular data can generally be answered in the negative"