> At what point would you suggest the government should have taken away that 8% ownership so he would not become a billionaire? I'm not suggesting that. It's

> At what point would you suggest the government should have taken away that 8% ownership so he would not become a billionaire? I'm not suggesting that. It's ok if people are billionaires, if defined by having large holdings that, if liquidated, would shrink to non billionaire scales to give back to society.