3 ms·
> But from any normal person's perspective, it's expensive. Why does it matter what that hypothetical "normal" person thinks? Does that "normal" person have in
by yupper32 4y ago
> But from any normal person's perspective, it's expensive.
Why does it matter what that hypothetical "normal" person thinks? Does that "normal" person have insight into how much it costs to hire a competent executive?
- JohnFen 4y agoIt matters because "normal" people are the ones paying those extravagant salaries in the end.
- yupper32 4y agoThose normal people should know that $350k is a steal.
- 0xbadcafebee 4y agoThe normal person knows that just having big paycheck does not make an executive more competent. We have all seen people with huge paychecks fail spectacularly.
- themitigating 4y agoAre you saying there's no correlation between salary and performance?
- fluoridation 4y agoThere's no direct correlation, yes. If you took two executives (or really two people in any profession), one making 10x as much as the other, and swapped their positions, you would not see one position dropping to 10% performance and the other rising to 1000% performance. In all likelihood, they would both drop to 50-70% for a while and then stabilize to their original values. Individual persons are not orders of magnitude more productive on their own, they're just in environments that allow them to be more productive, for example by giving them control over more resources.