>> Maybe "anti-racist" would work > Clearly not, because it's an easily and frequently misunderstood term. To be clear, that second paragraph was mostly me be

>> Maybe "anti-racist" would work > Clearly not, because it's an easily and frequently misunderstood term. To be clear, that second paragraph was mostly me being frustrated with the fact that a term which seems like it's so straightforward in its meaning is such a source of confusion and outrage for so many people. It's baffling to me that someone would assume "anti-racist layoff" meant "we're going to decide who to fire based on their race". At the very least that's clearly much more of a legal nightmare, and would be an extremely bizarre thing for a company to say out loud.