> Roughly the same as the inefficiencies of an electric stove. That does not seem believable at face value. I will leave the electric vs induction to a side s

> Roughly the same as the inefficiencies of an electric stove. That does not seem believable at face value. I will leave the electric vs induction to a side since we'd both be playing mind reading games if either of us argue one way or another. > None of which serve the same "peaker" purpose. I agree that none of the other options currently serve that purpose at the scale of natural gas. But the discussion is about long term solution.