III is kind of a vacuous statement. It purports to know something unknowable, and seems to imply something without explicitly stating it. Hardly a "safe assum

III is kind of a vacuous statement. It purports to know something unknowable, and seems to imply something without explicitly stating it. Hardly a "safe assumption". It might be more constructive to write down your actual conclusion. I'm sure you have a point to make, and I for one would like to hear it.