4 ms·
Thirty seconds of googling reveals that this is a myth: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11031097/ns/technology_and_science-space/t/myths-about-challenger-shuttle-di
by gammarator 15y ago
Thirty seconds of googling reveals that this is a myth: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11031097/ns/technology_and_science-space/t/myths-about-challenger-shuttle-disaster/#.TtLdKEo7qWU http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11031097/ns/technology_and_scien...
- jackfoxy 15y agoYou're right. A little more googling http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_external_tank http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_external_tank reveals the old foam began to be phased-out in 1996, with complete phase-out in 1997. Tile loss and other damage starting even with the first flight were assumed to be related to foam loss, and the foam loss itself was determined/assumed to be due to anomalies in foam application.