4 ms·
It already has turned against us. In the 1800s with the USPS, we had ultimate privacy - nobody could open physical mail without a warrant, under strict legal pe
by TakeBlaster16 4y ago
It already has turned against us. In the 1800s with the USPS, we had ultimate privacy - nobody could open physical mail without a warrant, under strict legal penalties. In modern times we have the third-party doctrine[1], where the moment bytes leave your network you have "no reasonable expectation of privacy". If you want privacy now, you can never give anyone any data or do business with any third party, including relying on a third party to route your network packets.
Or you can take matters into your own hands, with encryption.
If someone calls me a fool for using HTTPS and encrypted messaging, I'm fine with that.
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_doctrine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_doctrine
- lottin 4y agoGet a grip. The fact that you personally or somebody else doesn't agree with a government policy doesn't mean that the government has turned against its people.
- TakeBlaster16 4y agoDescribing it as a government policy is trivializing things a bit. You could also describe Japanese internment camps or cash-for-kids as a "government policy". Governments absolutely turn against their people. Regularly. If they get their way and privacy is eradicated, things will get far worse. Imagine if in the 1940s you could have written an SQL query to get a list of everyone who had ever done business with somebody who's Japanese. We'd be living in a very different world. But maybe you're fine with that. After all, nothing to hide, nothing to fear, right?