7 ms·
Your tagline seems strikingly similar to Loki’s tagline. What benefits does this provide that Loki doesn’t?
by _boffin_ 4y ago
Your tagline seems strikingly similar to Loki’s tagline. What benefits does this provide that Loki doesn’t?
- senko 4y agoClickable link to Loki on GitHub: https://github.com/grafana/loki https://github.com/grafana/loki
- candiddevmike 4y agoI can't find much, this requires S3 so you can't use it with local disk. Doesn't seem simpler than Loki in that regard, just less features.
- baq 4y ago'requires S3' (had to read your comment) and 'simple' (headline) shouldn't be in the same sentence :/
- Hamuko 4y agoBut the "S" in "S3" stands for "Simple".
- seimour 4y agoWhat does the "3" stand for?
- dljsjr 4y agoSimple Storage Service (3 S's).
- deathanatos 4y agoIt means there are 3 S's. "Simple Storage Service", or "S3". (See https://aws.amazon.com/s3/ https://aws.amazon.com/s3/ — "Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) is […]")
- thayne 4y agoIt's simple in that if you are already using an s3 compatible object store you don't have to worry about setting up a separate redundant, durable, highly available, and possibly scalable storage system for your logs. And as for the implementation of this or Loki, it means they can delegate most of the complexity of data storage to a separate object store.
- baq 4y agowell, what if I just want to run this on my laptop...?
- marcofatica 4y agorun minio locally
- thayne 4y agoIt looks like Loki at least supports using the local filesystem as an object store. I don't know about Parseable.io. But also, running on your laptop isn't really the intended use case.