> I am in favor of double-blind, non-public peer reviews because I don't want to invite 4Chan into my daily work. At least for mathematics papers, the communit

> I am in favor of double-blind, non-public peer reviews because I don't want to invite 4Chan into my daily work. At least for mathematics papers, the community who works in a particular area, and is thus actually able to do a review the paper, is pretty small. Since, on the other hand, the style that you use for mathematical proofs is like a fingerprint, double-blind peer reviews are next to impossible.