Some valid info here, but also some utter absurdity, and they're mixed together without distinction or comment. For example: with a completely straight face, t

Some valid info here, but also some utter absurdity, and they're mixed together without distinction or comment. For example: with a completely straight face, the author constructs an "inverted hockey stick" from two data points on wild land mammal mass and predicts the complete extinction of wild land mammals in a matter of decades. It seems like, after plotting a few hockey sticks, the author bought into his own conceit and started hallucinating them everywhere.