3 ms·
I am quite amazed at this PLAGIARISM that you are doing on your blog. Why is it so hard to simply give us (here on HN) a link to the original article which is a
by iptoc 15y ago
I am quite amazed at this PLAGIARISM that you are doing on your blog. Why is it so hard to simply give us (here on HN) a link to the original article which is actually: http://www.slideshare.net/beingpractical/google-in-its-midlife-crisis http://www.slideshare.net/beingpractical/google-in-its-midli... ?
Why do you have to copy the entire article on your blog word for word and then give us a link to your blog? Adsense-greedy?
I asked you the same question in a different thread: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3283447 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3283447 but you simply deleted your thread instead of giving a proper response and attribution to the proper article.
- akarambir 15y agoI have given Link to the original post in the first line itself. Read the first line which says- "PJ posted last friday" Moreover I was trying to put my counter point on that article.
- iptoc 15y agoFair enough. I took this post in bad faith as well after you went ahead and deleted your thread in http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3283447 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3283447 instead of replying to my comment. Yes, this post does have attribution but I still doubt whether you have the permission from the original author to copy entire content word for word in your blog. You usually need a license from the original author to do that kind of a thing. A better way to do this could be to quote only some interesting parts or only those parts from the original post against which you want to present a counterpoint. That might be reasonable as per "fair use".
- akarambir 15y agook, i get the point. Will always keep in mind. Thanks Susam sir